Thanks again to the great blog posts that Rob has been doing with the debate on climate change! I’m excited to see the Daily Show interview too, so Rob…please make sure you Twitter, Facebook, email, text, call, yell, or smoke signal the air date when you find out. I’m interested to see the “smackdown”! I certainly agree with Rob in his series on Global Warming/Climate Change. I especially agree that our viewers in the past few years have been asking more than the general “What’s the weather?” question. Which means either the media hype is driving climatology to the forefront, or that we, the local weather authorities are doing our AMS duty by continually educating our viewers on environmental issues.
Even though Rob and I (because of our schedules) only get a few chances to sit down together and really “go weather geek” every once in a while. I know that he is always trying to keep up with the latest technology, environmental issues, forecasting techniques, while all the time just trying to let everyone know if it’s going to rain at a festival. As he speaks or writes in technical terms, you realize just how much he has absorbed in his 1/4 century of weather forecasting (Sorry dude, you’re older than me). But remember, Rob still likes sports, The Daily Show, Facebook, and all of the other things we do every day. And, like you and me, he’s watching the forecast to see if he can schedule a “day in the yard” .
So enough of the butt kissing. Now, I don’t have 25 years of forecasting experience, but from my first little “Radar” job with McDonough County, Illinois civil defense beginning in 1988, I’m starting to realize why the “grays” are showing up as I too approach the quarter century mark. I read the same journals and have met or listened to the finest weather experts on the planet. Plus, being in the media for (nearly) 20 years..I’ve gotten a good dose of what most would call…sensationalism.
The number one thing that I and many of the local media meteorologists and weather casters, absolutely, positively, agree with is, “We need more time to study this issue before we come to a definitive conclusion.” Thanks to the rapid advancement of technology in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, information comes easier to all of us. More importantly, the quality of that information is better or as I like to say, “It’s in HD!” Rather than taking a scientific approach to explaining recent disasters and applying some kind of theory or blame, I want to take a more realistic view of why it appears that there are more disasters. I can sum this up in four words. “THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE!” The summation is four words, now the 1000 word explanation. Sorry folks, I don’t get to talk much in my short weather forecasts, so my blogs and KATC.com stories are usually long.
Lets start with the San Francisco Earthquake in 1906. This quake wiped out a great American city in a matter of minutes. The telegraph lines were the only method of rapidly getting the news of the disaster to the rest of the nation and the world. Most people east of the Rockies didn’t know the earthquake had happened until the next day when they read the headline on their newspaper. A full 24 hours! Today, if a disaster happens anywhere in the world, it is transmitted instantaneously via TV, radio, internet, and mobile devices. Because we can video or take a picture with our mobile phones, we get an instant view of what’s going on in real time! Plus, because there are more of us on the planet, there are more of us to gather that news and send it to our friends! So, if 10,000 people can send info from the Haitian earthquake zone, do we think there were 10,000 earthquakes? Of course not. Are we having more disasters around the world than we did in 1906? Probably not, there’s just more of us to see them, more of us to spread the news, and more of us connected around the world at the same time!
Are there more tornadoes? 100 years ago, the Great Plains were sparsely populated, so hundreds of tornadoes might have drifted across the landscape, never being seen by anyone. Does that mean those tornadoes didn’t happen? It’s funny to think of a tornado chaser in a horse drawn carriage, with a pencil and paper to draw the tornado with. Do you think his friends would believe him when he showed them his drawing?
Are there more hurricanes? Are they more destructive? I’ll refer to the above paragraph about the number of hurricanes. 100 years ago, unless you were on a ship, you would never know if there was a hurricane in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Remember, not all hurricanes hit land. Like the tornado, if there was no one to see the hurricane, did it really exist? Of course it did. But we’ll never know the actual count from 100 years ago.
As far as hurricanes being more destructive. I’ll have to say “YES!” Now remember, I said “more destructive”, not “more powerful”. Since there are more people living along coastlines than there were 100 years ago, there are more homes, businesses, and infrastructure in general. If there is more to destroy, then it is more destructive. Even tiny little Tropical Storm Allison in 2001 was destructive. But overall, was it powerful? No.
Can global warming create more powerful hurricanes? That’s an, “I don’t know” Sure, warmer waters can add fuel to the fire, but if global warming is actually taking place, then the atmosphere and the waters would be warming at the same time. So the ratio would remain about the same. In weather, it’s the more “opposite” features that create the rough stuff. Hot air and warm air colliding doesn’t produce a severe weather event like hot air and “cold” air colliding. In 2005 (click links for maps) we had 28 named storms and four category 5 hurricanes. In 1933, there were 21 named storms, and zero Cat 5′s. Strange, though. When you look at the map for 1933, almost every storm formed west of 55 degrees longitude. In 2005, we had seven named storms that formed EAST of 55 degrees and never went west of 60. So, if we subtract those seven storms, we get a total of 21…just like in 1933. There were no satellites in 1933, so maybe there were more hurricanes, and possibly some of those could have been Cat. Fives. If nobody was there to see them, then they must not have happened right? You can’t compare 2005 data to 1933, or 1833, or 833.
Therefore, if there are more people, it doesn’t mean there are more natural disasters world wide. It just means more people are around to witness these disasters. And with the technology today, more connected people can send and view these disasters at the same time anywhere on the planet!
Now for my take on the whole Global Warming thing as a whole. Nothing technical here at all, just my answers and beliefs. Do I believe that Global Warming exists. “Yes“. Do I believe that our actions in the last 100 years have accelerated Global Warming. “Yes“, but only because since there are more of us, there are more of us to screw things up. Do I believe Global Warming has “naturally” happened in the past? “Yes“ Do I believe Global Warming will melt the ice caps and trigger sea level rises? “Yes“ Do I believe that if the planet warms, and the ice caps melt, and there is more water available for evaporation and that evaporated water becomes clouds, reducing the amount of the sun’s energy to reach the surface of the Earth gradually cooling us back down? “Yes“ Do I believe that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction? “Yes“ Do I believe (Natural or Man Made) Global Warming could eventually trigger Global Cooling? “Yes“
Do I think global warming is producing more weather events and disasters than there were 100 years ago. “NO” Do I think global warming will have a significant impact on the number and intensity of tropical systems in the near future? “Absolutely NO!” Do I think global warming is going to screw up my 8 day forecast this week? “Um, No.”
Do I think we should abandon all environmental causes and rape the Earth of all of its natural resourses while dumping all of our waste and polluting the planet with no accountability and no plan to preserve the world that our children and grandchildren will inheret? Will you believe someone has asked me this question already when I disagreed with their political view? My answer, “Of course not!”
Do I think any one of the floodwalls in New Orleans could have collapsed (or been sabotaged) on any given sunny Thursday afternoon flooding the city with 450,000 people going about their daily business? “YES”
Do I think any major city on the planet is threatened by some sort of natural disaster and could be destroyed to a point even worse than a “Katrina”? “Yep, it’s already happened in China, Haiti, etc…..”
Do I think I can trust someone like Al Gore to accurately predict the weather for April 15th, 3010? Come on folks, some of you reading this don’t believe Rob or I will get the forecast right this weekend!

StormTeam3 Meteorologist Dave Baker
Good Morning Acadiana-Weekdays 5-7am!
weather@katctv.com